Monday, April 27, 2015

Starman: Bricks Past (or maybe Building With David '15)

The fine (if legally and morally questionable) folks at Sheng Yuan, purveyors of slightly-off-model but mostly pretty good Lego knockoff bootleg compatible minifigures recently made a figure of DC Comics character Stargirl, though she was packaged as part of a Captain America line (because "Research? What research?") and came equipped with a shield and gun.  As a fan of the character (who is awesome in the Lego Batman 3: Beyond Gotham, btw), I felt the need to equip her properly, so I built as close an approximation as I could of her cosmic energy staff.

And then I remembered, oh yeah, the 1995-2005 Starman series by James Robinson et al. is my favorite DC series ever, and Jack Knight is in the top tier of my favorite comics characters ever, so making him became a priority.  A Lone Ranger torso, Tony Stark head, pompadour, tan legs, and one more cosmic staff later, and I was pretty happy with the results.  The torso isn't exactly right, but close enough for government work and it looks a lot better than any homemade decal attempt would.  Now all I need is a proper set of tank / night vision goggles for him.  I'm eyeing these ones from Brick Forge, so long as they'll fit over the hair piece.

And now, of course, I'm desperate to make the rest of the cast.  Here's hoping I can find a satisfactory way to make Ted Knight's head fin.

Tuesday, April 21, 2015

Brad Bird's "The Spirit " 1980 pencil-test "trailer"

Saw this on the Bendis Tumblr and thought it was too cool not to share... Brad Bird's 1980 pencil test kinda-sorta trailer for an animated version of Will Eisner's The Spirit. Oh, man, what I wouldn't give to see a completed version of this!

Monday, April 20, 2015

Daredevil, comics, and Marvel's cinematic Lego

I haven't had a chance to finish the Netflix Daredevil series yet - as I type this, I've watched the first 7 episodes - so I don't have a complete reaction to it yet besides maybe a "Arrgghajsderbleereeeeee" sort of foaming at the mouth from all of the awesome so far.  I also have a renewed interest in the character's comics past that I was only ever tangentially aware of at best because I had never read much Daredevil up until the Mark Waid run because all of the grim 'n gritty comics that came in the wake of the Miller stuff turned me off from ever wanting to check out most of the work that actually caused the boom in the first place, and the Bendis & Brubaker work just seemed even more bleak still.  But I'm reconsidering all that and starting to go back.  So far I really like it all, but I'm a different kind of fan and reader than I was back then (even during the comparatively recent Bendis/Brubaker years), so it may just be a time/age thing.

But I digress, because what I really want to talk about is the show itself, and how it fits into the greater Marvel cinematic/TV picture.

Back when the original slate of Marvel movie properties was announced and it was made clear that they would indeed all interconnect, a lot of people wondered how well they'd actually mesh in a non-comics environment.  The comics lifers would happily accept it, sure, but would the non-comics "mainstream" be able to buy into a world where hi-tech armored suits could co-exist with giant rage monsters, pan-dimensional godlike beings, and a genetically-modified member of the Greatest Generation flash frozen like a bag of Birds Eye peas and thawed out today... and then, more audaciously, combined into a single movie?

Obviously, they accepted that to the tune of billions of dollars, and have thrown even more disparate elements into the mix, like Vin Diesel trees and space raccoons.  That success, which seemed so unlikely a year ago, makes us all hopeful that an incredible shrinking Paul Rudd will be similarly accepted (and based on that new trailer, I think they have a shot).  I've always said that the secret of Marvel's Hollywood success in recent years is that they haven't been trying to make good superhero movies, it's that they're making good movies that happen to have superheroes in them.

Daredevil, however, has made me rethink that a bit.  That formula is still a part of the success, sure, but I think it's more than that.  What makes the Marvel Cinematic (and TV) Universe work is the same thing that makes Lego or Tupperware work: it's modular.  You can go buy every Lego set from a particular line or every container Tupperware makes and enjoy the complete experience, but you can also just pick up the individual kits/pieces that serve your particular needs and still be completely satisfied.  The Marvel movies and TV shows require the exact same level of buy-in: only as much as you want or need.  You can watch every single movie and show, follow the connections (both the obvious and the more subtle ones), and have a great experience watching an entire universe unfold, but if you only like a few or even just one of them, you can still have a completely satisfying experience.  You can move on to explore the bigger picture if you want, or you can just be happy with, say, Guardians of the Galaxy and call it good.

We shouldn't be surprised... it was the secret to their success in the comics world, after all.  For all the talk about the interconnectedness of the Marvel Universe even going back to the earliest days, when Johnny Storm would read a comic about the Hulk or Thor would fly past a window or whatever, if you just wanted to read Amazing Spider-Man, you could just read Amazing Spider-Man and be perfectly happy.  The journey to the larger experience was always an option, but it was never a requirement.

We really should have had a little more faith in the non-comics audiences.  I say we because I was just as guilty of this as anyone.  Everyone is looking to go on a journey with their entertainment, they just don't want to be forced on one.  Don't give people requirements, that feels like homework and no one likes homework; give them options and a path to follow, multiple paths, even.  Indicate how the blind lawyer vigilante and the space raccoon may connect in a roundabout fashion, but let the audience decide whether or not they want to make those connections.  Do that and they're more likely to give you their attention.  And their money.

Thursday, March 19, 2015

Pretty Sketchy: X-Factor #30, p. 19 by Valentine DeLandro & Andrew Hennessy

I wrote a little while ago about my unabashed love for Peter David's X-Factor, so when the opportunity presented itself to buy original art from the series (and at a price I could swing), I had to jump at it.  This page by Valentine De Landro (with inks by Andrew Hennessy) is a beaut... you have Jamie Madrox (my favorite character from the series) using his powers, the usually immaculate M in a state of comedic dishevelment, robots, and some great reaction shots from others in the cast.

Yeah, this one's a keeper.  Thanks to Ruben at Comic Book Art Gallery for helping to put this in my hands.  I promise to give it a good home.

Tuesday, March 17, 2015

Less killing, more jokes (some thoughts on the Batgirl cover and other recent DC moves)

Um, no thanks.
 Credit where it's due to DC... they're awesome at pushing people's buttons.

In case you missed it, the latest thing (in what seems like a long, long chain of events) was a solicited cover for Batgirl featuring the Joker with his arm around the title character, looking terrified, crying, and severely traumatized.  The cover (which I won't post here) was one of many to be released as part of a line of variant covers celebrating the anniversary of the Joker's creation and harkened back to Alan Moore & Brian Bolland's Batman: The Killing Joke. This is a famous one-shot story from the 80s examining the Batman and Joker's relationship, and also features a scene where Joker shoots Barbara Gordon in the gut (ending her Batgirl career and causing her to be paralyzed, strips her, takes pictures of her crying and naked, and maybe rapes her.  Both Moore and DC editorial have always insisted that he didn't, but it sure as hell reads like he did and even if he didn't it's still a crime of sexual assault.

So yeah.  A cover harkening back to that.  On a book that has rather famously rebranded itself as an upbeat, fun superhero series.  Poor taste AND out of place... they really hit the Daily Double there.

The cover has since been pulled - by its artist, Rafael Albuquerque, no less, not by DC editorial decision - due to threats of violence caused in the wake of the online discussion about it.  Not threats against Albuquerque or anyone involved in its creation, mind you, but against people online who said they didn't like it, because internet people have this habit lately of being among history's greatest monsters.  Gah.

I'm of two minds on this.  For one thing, it was a variant, not the main cover, and therefore the sort of thing that people could easily opt not to by and that retailers could outright refuse to stock.  It was just as much DC's right to publish it as it was someone's right to not buy it.

That being said, I'm pleased it's being pulled.  Albuquerque is an incredible artist and if his intention was to provoke an uneasy reaction he succeeded.  But as I said above, I thought it was in poor taste, and in the interest of full disclosure, I hate The Killing Joke and what it tried to do to the character of Barbara Gordon.  That other writers were able to come along, recreate her as Oracle, and build such a strong character from the ashes of the slash & burn technique applied to her is amazing.  I find it unfortunate and downright distasteful that in her current continuity the Joker's attack remains but her time as Oracle has been retconned away, but that's a rant for another day I'm sure.

Finally, it's awful that anyone on any level got threatened because of a damn comic book cover.  Get your act together, comics internet.  That's Gamergate-level bullshittery there.

All this comes on the heels of last week's announcements of the changes coming down the pike to Wonder Woman (armored), Batman (also armored, and kind of a bunny?), and Superman (Springsteen album cover), which also had people all kinds of worked up and resulted in a lot of threats and bruised feelings on the Twitters, particular in regards to Wonder Woman.  To weigh in on those (which is required under Comics Internet Law): Wonder Woman's armor makes a sort of sense though it's too busy and I actually prefer her initial DCnU look; Superman's look was slightly easier to take once I realized the red on his hands was wrapped up cape and not blood, but I still thing superheroes in street clothes is dumb (though I totally dig the Fleischer cartoon-styled S shield); and Bionic Bunny is just silly.

Maybe there are story-driven reasons for all of these, and maybe they'll even be really good.  But if you're trying to promote Big New Changes and just present more of the same stuff that people found off-putting  in the first place, that's not going to inspire many people to give it a chance.

Of course, compared to this latest flap, merely having my aesthetic senses offended seems almost quaint, and much easier to take.  Were I of the tinfoil hat conspiracy theory bent, I'd wonder if maybe that was the plan all along.

Regardless, we're all talking about them now, and that was definitely the plan all along. Button-pushing to this degree may not be a good thing, but that they are good at it cannot be denied.